In Re Edy D.

People v. Edy D.

Good Law
120 Cal. App. 4th 1199·16 Cal. Rptr. 3d 293·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1203·2004 Daily Journal DAR 9151·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6757
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 26, 2004B166775California1,031 words

Opinion

Opinion

Curry, J.

Edy D. appeals from a judgment entered declaring him a ward of the court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 upon a finding that he had committed petty theft, a misdemeanor, in violation of Penal Code section 484, subdivision (a). Placed home on probation, he contends the trial court violated his right to due process in failing to consider a disposition pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 725, subdivision (a), as punishment for exercising his right to adjudication. For reasons explained in the opinion, we reverse the disposition order.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

Immediately prior to adjudication, the minor moved pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 170.1 to disqualify the judge for trial purposes. Defense counsel explained that while the trial court believed the motion was untimely, the problem was that when the parties last came to court and tried to discuss disposition, the court advised that “the 725 disposition was off the table because [defense counsel] was setting it for trial.” Defense counsel argued the court could not be fair in terms of disposition when the court had already decided appellant should not receive a 725,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.