Roman

Roman v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
102 Cal. Rptr. 2d 13·2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 927·2000 Daily Journal DAR 12991·85 Cal. App. 4th 316·84 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1324
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 9, 2000B133625California3,527 words

Opinion

Opinion

Todd, J.

Appellant Edward Roman appeals from an order dismissing his verified first amended complaint after the trial court sustained the County of Los Angeles’s (County) general demurrer, without leave to amend, to each of its eight causes of action. All of the causes of action in the amended complaint arose from County’s alleged discriminatory treatment of appellant, its employee. The trial court concluded that six causes of action were barred by the statute of limitations and the other two by appellant’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. Appellant’s primary contentions on appeal are that his claims for employment discrimination under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) and title VH of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and 1991 were timely filed because they were filed within one year of his receipt of a right-to-sue letter from the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) and because the continuing violation doctrine is applicable.

We reverse with directions.

Procedural Background and Factual Allegations

Appellant filed a verified complaint “For Employment Discrimination” on September 30, 1998. County’s general demurrer to each of the eight causes of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.