Franklin & Franklin v. 7-Eleven Owners for Fair Franchising

Good Law
102 Cal. Rptr. 2d 770·2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 997·2001 Daily Journal DAR 63·85 Cal. App. 4th 1168·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 62
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 29, 2000A085722California3,338 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sepulveda, J.

Appellants, several lawyers and law firms, appeal from an injunction entered by the Alameda Superior Court restraining them from prosecuting two civil actions for damages and declaratory relief filed in the San Diego Superior Court. The San Diego proceedings arose out of class action litigation that had been pending before the Alameda Superior Court for over four years and, at the time the injunction issued, was (and is) pending in this court on appeal from a judgment approving the settlement of the class action and an award of $4.7-5 million in attorneys’ fees to appellants and other class counsel.

The class action litigation was brought against the Southland Corporation, the franchiser of the 7-Eleven stores, by a subsequently certified national class consisting of present and former 7-Eleven franchisees. In brief, the class of plaintiff-franchisees in the Alameda litigation alleged Southland had breached its franchise agreements with them by failing to share ratably in certain rebates, discounts, and allowances provided the company by vendors of products and services sold at retail by the franchisees. Following extensive discovery and class certification by the trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.