Riggs

People v. Riggs

Good Law
102 Cal. Rptr. 2d 121·85 Cal. App. 4th 327
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 2001C029575California1,917 words

Opinion

Opinion

Certified for Partial Publication. [*]

A jury convicted defendant of receiving stolen property. (Pen.Code, § 496, subd. (a). [1] ) He admitted having suffered one prior "strike," a 1995 robbery conviction (§ 211) arising out of an attempted shoplifting. The court, pursuant to section 1385, denied defendant's motion to dismiss the strike prior and sentenced him to the two year prison midterm, doubled under section 1170.12, subdivision (c)(1).

At the time of sentencing, defendant was serving a sentence for a 1997 second degree burglary conviction (§ 459) in El Dorado County, also arising out of an attempted shoplifting, and the court resentenced defendant on the El Dorado County offense to a consecutive term of 16 months, i.e., one-third the two year prison midterm pursuant to section 1170.1, subdivision (a), doubled.

Both parties appealed. Defendant contends that in denying the motion to dismiss the strike prior, the court failed to take into account certain "individualized considerations" pertaining to his background and the nature of the offense. The People assert the court erred by not ordering the sentence to run consecutive to the sentence previously imposed in El…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.