Tosco Corp. v. General Ins. Co. of America

Good Law
102 Cal. Rptr. 2d 657·85 Cal. App. 4th 1016
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 28, 2000A082765, A084044, A086154California2,744 words

Opinion

Opinion

Plaintiff Tosco Corporation brought this action against numerous insurers to establish insurance coverage for environmental cleanup costs. The appeals now before us arise from summary judgments entered in favor of three insurers on the authority of A.C. Label Co. v. Transamerica Ins. Co. (1996) 48 Cal.App.4th 1188 , 56 Cal.Rptr.2d 207 (AC. Label ), which held that a comprehensive general liability insurer could not be required to defend or indemnify an insured with respect to liabilities arising from property that the insured did not own during the policy period. On appeal plaintiff contends that we should take issue with that decision. We decline to do so, and affirm the judgments.

Tosco's third amended complaint sought declaratory relief and damages against respondents General Insurance Company of America (General), Chicago Insurance Co. (Chicago), Commercial Union Insurance Co. (Commercial Union), and many other insurers. Tosco alleged that it was the insured under primary or excess policies of comprehensive general liability (CGL) insurance issued by the defendants between January 24, 1962, and August 1, 1991. [1] General's policy allegedly covered a period…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.