Manning

Manning v. Department of Motor Vehicles

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 115·61 Cal. App. 4th 273·71 Cal. Rptr. 2d 647·98 Daily Journal DAR 1491·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1095
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 1998G016679California1,106 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sills, J.

— Richard J. Manning was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol and submitted to a urine test. The forensic report from the Orange County Sheriff-Coroner Department crime laboratory showed he had a blood-alcohol concentration above the legal limit of 0.08 percent. Following an administrative per se hearing, the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) suspended his driving privilege for driving with a blood-1 alcohol concentration in excess of the legal limit.

Manning petitioned for writ of administrative mandamus. The superior court issued the writ and the DMV appealed. We affirmed the judgment in a nonpublished opinion, relying on Wheeler v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1994) 34 Cal.App.4th 228 [ 45 Cal.Rptr.2d 462 ]. Wheeler held, among other things, that a forensic blood test must be sworn to be admissible in an administrative per se hearing. However, the Supreme Court granted review in this case and, after it issued its opinion in Lake v. Reed (1997) 16 Cal.4th 448 [ 65 Cal.Rptr.2d 860 , 940 P.2d 311 ], transferred it to us with directions to reconsider the cause in light of Lake .

Lake held that “. . . a forensic laboratory report need not be sworn as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.