Montgomery v. Cal Accountants Mutual Ins. Co.

Good Law
61 Cal. App. 4th 854·72 Cal. Rptr. 2d 39
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 1998B107899California1,920 words

Opinion

Opinion

Plaintiff Belfa Kay Montgomery appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant Cal Accountants Mutual Insurance Company. We affirm.

In September 1987, Brett Cleaver (Cleaver) and Michael Beck (Beck) asked plaintiff to become a partner in their accounting firm. Plaintiff was hesitant to do so: She had given up accounting some years before; she had allowed her license as a certified public accountant to lapse. She was nonetheless intrigued by the prospect of becoming a partner in the firm. They discussed buy-in amount and compensation, deciding all partners would share equally in the firm's profits.

The firm added plaintiff's name to its own, changing its name to Cleaver, Beck, Blank, Stein & Montgomery. It added plaintiff's name to its letterhead, listing her as a partner.

On December 19, 1987, plaintiff signed a letter to Fred S. James & Company, insurance agents, written on Cleaver, Beck, Blank, Stein & Montgomery letterhead; she was identified below her signature as a partner in the firm. On January 11, 1988, Cleaver wrote to Fred S. James & Company advising them that plaintiff had been made a partner in the firm so that she could be added to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.