Hellweg

Hellweg v. Cassidy

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 133·61 Cal. App. 4th 806·71 Cal. Rptr. 2d 798·98 Daily Journal DAR 1699·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1225
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 1998B112752California1,506 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stone, J.

Appellant, Jacqueline Monier Cassidy (Cassidy), obtained a loan secured by a deed of trust on the residential property she owned at 101 Fourth Street in Fillmore. The trust deed and beneficial interest were assigned from the original lender to the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae). Cassidy owns the adjoining, unimproved property. She recorded an approved legal lot line adjustment to add 0.10 acre from the unimproved property to the residential property. Because she owned the adjacent, contiguous property, no new, separate deed was required to transfer title. She did not modify the deed to reflect the lot line adjustment.

Cassidy entered into escrow with respondents, Eric Hellweg and Debra Bereki, to sell the residential property to them. She told them that the sale property included the added 0.10 acre. At the time, Cassidy was in default on the loan assigned to Fannie Mae and she did not get approval for a short payoff. Consequently, the parties canceled the escrow.

Fannie Mae foreclosed on and acquired the property. The trustee’s deed upon sale reflected the legal description which existed before the lot line adjustment. However, directly underneath…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.