In Re Hb

Good Law
161 Cal. App. 4th 115·74 Cal. Rptr. 3d 27
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 2008B200606California2,320 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gail B., the mother of four-year-old H.B., appeals from the juvenile court's order terminating her parental rights under Welfare & Institutions Code section 366.26. Without ever affirmatively stating either she or H.B. may have American Indian ancestry, Gail B. contends the juvenile court's failure to inquire about such ancestry violated the Indian Child Welfare Act ( 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq. (ICWA)) and requires reversal of the termination order. We affirm.

The jurisdiction/disposition report prepared by the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (Department) for H.B.'s June 29, 2005 hearing provides a compelling overview of Gail B.'s experience with the dependency court: "This is truly a sad case. The history of Gail B[.]'s life is well known to the Juvenile Dependency Court—first as a 9-year dependent herself and now, for the last seven years, as the mother of children [D.B, D.B., B.B. and T.B.] who are currently dependents of the Court. Now, her fifth child H.B. has been detained by DCFS after mother failed a Voluntary Family Maintenance Plan that had been extended to ten months and included the additional supportive services of Family…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.