Flannery

Flannery v. California Highway Patrol

Bad Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 114·61 Cal. App. 4th 629·71 Cal. Rptr. 2d 632·98 Daily Journal DAR 1505·76 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 212
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 1998A076872California7,562 words

Opinion

Opinion

Strankman, J.

The principal question in this appeal is whether a California court must apply standards applicable to federal fee-shifting statutes when it awards reasonable attorney fees to a prevailing plaintiff in an action under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.; FEHA). We conclude that California law, not federal law, applies. Nevertheless, we also conclude that the order awarding fees in this case must be reversed and remanded for reconsideration of the amount of the award.

Factual and Procedural Background

Plaintiff Leslie M. Flannery was terminated from her employment as a California Highway Patrol (CHP) traffic officer in 1993. She sued the CHP and others, alleging harassment and wrongful termination in violation of the FEHA, because of gender-based discrimination or in retaliation for an earlier discrimination claim. She sought reinstatement and damages.

After a lengthy trial, the jury returned a general verdict awarding plaintiff $250,000. The judgment entered upon that verdict also included orders granting injunctive relief as to plaintiff’s personnel file and status as a CHP officer.

Plaintiff moved for attorney fees and expenses…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.