FMC Corp. v. Plaisted & Companies

Caution
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 169·61 Cal. App. 4th 1132·72 Cal. Rptr. 2d 467·98 Daily Journal DAR 2121·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1535
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 3, 1998Docket Nos. H013360, H015090, H015511, H016104, H016674, H016805, H016806, H017215California11,155 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bamattre-Manoukian, J.

— These eight appeals arise from a single superior court action, and address specific aspects of the duty of a general liability insurer to indemnify its insured for the cost of reimbursing government agencies and of complying with orders for investigation and remediation of toxic contamination to soil, surface water, and groundwater beneath the surface of the soil.

The general liability insurance policies, issued by London insurers, are of the type known in American insurance practice as comprehensive or commercial general liability (or CGL) policies. The policies contain indemnification provisions similar to those of standard form CGL policies but omit the explicit duty-to-defend provisions commonly included in CGL policies. The policies’ indemnification provisions require, in pertinent part and subject to many qualifications, that the insurer indemnify the insured for all sums the insured shall be obligated to pay by reason of liability for property damage as defined. In a writ proceeding arising out of this action the Supreme Court has established as general propositions, and insofar as applicable to these policies, that contamination of the environment is property…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.