Saunders

Saunders v. Taylor

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 157·42 Cal. App. 4th 1538·50 Cal. Rptr. 2d 395·96 Daily Journal DAR 2232·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1342
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 1996E013318California2,173 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.

Factual and Procedural Background

In 1987, Mr. and Mrs. Saunders purchased a house from Mr. and Mrs. Taylor for $87,500. Prior to the close of escrow, the Taylors executed and delivered a real estate transfer disclosure statement to the Saunderses as required by Civil Code section 1102.2 et seq. That disclosure form asked, inter alia, whether the sellers were aware of any “[rjoom additions, structural modifications, or other alterations or repairs made without necessary permits” or which were “not in compliance with building codes.” (§ 1102.6.) The Taylors answered “no” to both questions.

In October of 1990, the Saunderses had the house appraised in order to obtain a home improvement loan. The appraiser told them that he could not locate any building permits for a family room which had been added by enclosing a patio. The Saunderses thereafter confirmed with their city’s department of building and safety that there were no building permits issued either for the patio conversion or for several other improvements. The building inspector also informed them that the family room and various other alterations did not comply with applicable building codes. Contractors…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.