Border Business Park, Inc. v. City of San Diego

Good Law
142 Cal. App. 4th 1538·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1439·2006 Daily Journal DAR 12713·49 Cal. Rptr. 3d 259·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8909
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 2006E035881California11,622 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.

INTRODUCTION

The City of San Diego (the city) appeals a judgment for inverse condemnation awarding $65.3 million in damages to Border Business Park, Inc. (hereafter sometimes referred to as Border).

Border is a real estate development company which was developing a business park in Otay Mesa. Otay Mesa was then an unincorporated area in San Diego County adjacent to the Mexican border, and was later annexed by the city. Border asserted two causes of action for inverse condemnation. The. first arose from the city’s actions in connection with its announcements of a plan to create an international airport in Otay Mesa. Border contended that these announcements substantially interfered with sales of property within the business park and diminished the value of the property. The second inverse condemnation cause of action arose from the city’s diversion of truck traffic, engendered by a newly opened crossing at the Mexican border, in a manner which allegedly interfered substantially with access to the business park. ■

The city asserts numerous grounds for reversal of the inverse condemnation judgment. Because we agree with the city’s contention that the evidence was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.