Westside Center Associates v. Safeway Stores 23, Inc.

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 99·42 Cal. App. 4th 507·49 Cal. Rptr. 2d 793·96 Daily Journal DAR 1306·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 890
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 1996F019980California10,456 words

Opinion

Opinion

Martin, J.

This appeal involves a neighborhood shopping center in the Kern County community of Taft. The anchor position at the center was occupied for many years by a Safeway supermarket in which the various defendants (identified collectively as Safeway) have held an interest at some point. Safeway leased the building from a series of owners, none of which is still a party to this action. Ownership of the remainder of the center, consisting of numerous smaller stores, also passed through several hands before being acquired by the plaintiff, a partnership known as Westside Center Associates (WCA). Thus the shopping center was “fragmented” in that parts of it were owned by different entities; significantly, WCA never owned the Safeway building. It was in this configuration that the present dispute arose.

Citing a loss of profitability, Safeway closed the supermarket in 1987 with about 15 months left on its 20-year lease. Business at the rest of the center suffered as a result. About a year later, Safeway removed all the store fixtures. Soon after that, although it had no plans to reopen the supermarket and the parties had been unable to find a suitable replacement tenant, Safeway…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.