Averill

Averill v. Superior Court

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 152·42 Cal. App. 4th 1170·50 Cal. Rptr. 2d 62·96 D.A.R. 2061·96 Daily Journal DAR 2061
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 1996G018293California1,903 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rylaarsdam, J.

Petitioner, a homeowner, is a critic of a plan by a charitable organization to convert a house in her neighborhood into a shelter for battered women. Because of comments she made to her employer regarding that organization, it sued her for slander. A motion to strike pursuant to the anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) suit statute was denied. She filed a petition for writ of mandate which we grant.

Statement of Facts

In October, 1993, Jeannie Averill (Averill) learned Eli Home, Inc. (Eli) planned to purchase a home in her neighborhood for use as a shelter for battered women. The plan for the shelter became the subject of a number of Anaheim City Council and Planning Commission hearings. Averill was present at some of these meetings. She, along with a number of other neighbors, opposed the plan. Following one planning commission meeting, Eli sent a letter to some of the homeowners opposed to the project, threatening legal action if they continued to make allegedly slanderous statements. In August 1994, Averill presented a letter to the city council signed by residents who lived near Eli’s former shelter, located in Orange, describing noise and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.