Furlotti

Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n v. Furlotti

Good Law
1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 293·70 Cal. App. 4th 1487·83 Cal. Rptr. 2d 455·99 Daily Journal DAR 3103·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2401
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 31, 1999B117050California4,333 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aldrich, J.

Introduction

Defendants, Alex and Nancy Furlotti, Quorum Properties and Portofino Place (together the Furlottis), owners of a residential apartment building, appeal from the trial court’s order granting a preliminary injunction requiring them to remove a fence they erected along the property line between their building and the adjoining commercial property owned by plaintiff, Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association (Teachers). Because Teachers has not demonstrated a reasonable probability it will prevail on the merits at trial, the court below abused its discretion in granting the mandatory preliminary injunction. Accordingly, we reverse the order.

Factual and Procedural Background

The verified complaint, declarations and exhibits filed in connection with the preliminary injunction hearing disclose essentially undisputed facts. At the center of this controversy is a dead-end alley which runs east-west near the comer of Wilshire Boulevard and Bundy Avenue in Los Angeles and which is accessible only from Amherst Avenue. Measuring 21 feet wide, the alley separates the 14-story commercial office building known as the Wilshire/Bundy Plaza directly to the south, from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.