Farael

People v. Farael

Good Law
70 Cal. App. 4th 864·83 Cal. Rptr. 2d 16
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 12, 1999A079705California640 words

Opinion

Opinion

Corrigan, J.

J.Defendant Mony M. Farael was convicted of eight counts of insurance fraud and related charges. On appeal, he contends the trial judge erred in denying his motion for new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel and newly discovered evidence. He further asserts the court erred in setting conditions of probation. We affirm.

Background

A jury found defendant guilty of defrauding his insurer, Cigna Property & Casualty Company (Cigna), by staging burglaries and submitting false claim forms for property he claimed had been stolen from his business. In the unpublished portion of this opinion, we reject defendant’s claims that (1) his trial attorney rendered ineffective assistance, and (2) the court erred in imposing probation conditions restricting his ability to practice psychotherapy, counseling or financial management. In the published portion, we address his challenge to an additional condition of probation requiring him to sign a confession of judgment in favor of Cigna.

I.-IV.

Discussion

I., II.

III. The Probation Conditions Are Valid

A. The Bar on Counseling

B. The Confession of Judgment

Defendant also challenges the probation condition requiring him to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.