Monarch

Monarch v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.

Good Law
1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 241·70 Cal. App. 4th 1197·83 Cal. Rptr. 2d 247·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2216
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 25, 1999A081178California5,453 words

Opinion

Opinion

Swager, J.

J. — In a bifurcated proceeding, the jury found that appellant’s action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (hereafter the FELA) ( 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq.) to recover damages for his loss of hearing was barred by the three-year statute of limitations. The court subsequently entered judgment in favor of respondent, and this appeal ensued.

Appellant complains that the trial court erred by bifurcating the statute of limitations issue, altering the order of proof, excluding evidence of equitable estoppel, instructing the jury, and dismissing his fraud cause of action. We find that no prejudicial errors were committed, and affirm the judgment.

Statement of Facts

Appellant began his employment with Southern Pacific in 1963, and worked thereafter as a switchman, brakeman, and conductor. During the course of his employment duties until 1990, appellant was regularly subjected to loud, irritating noises from the locomotive engine, wheels and train whistle. The intensity of the noise varied with appellant’s location on the train and the duties he performed. Southern Pacific never informed appellant that the “noise” he experienced would cause permanent harm to his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.