Fuller-Austin Insulation Co. v. Highlands Insurance

Good Law
135 Cal. App. 4th 958·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 45·2006 Daily Journal DAR 741·38 Cal. Rptr. 3d 716·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 538
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 2006B170079California19,176 words

Opinion

Opinion

Todd, J.

Appellants Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London and Certain London Market Insurance Companies (collectively LMI); Stonewall Insurance Company (Stonewall); Transcontinental Insurance Company and Columbia Casualty Company (collectively CNA); First State Insurance Company, New England Reinsurance Corp., and Twin City Fire Insurance Company (collectively First State); and International Insurance Company (International) appeal from a judgment entered in favor of respondent Fuller-Austin Insulation Company (Fuller-Austin) following a phased bench and jury trial.

This action raises the issue of the effect of an insured’s bankruptcy under title 11 United States Code section 524 (g) on an excess insurer’s obligations. Fuller-Austin utilized the unique provisions of that statute to resolve its liability for present and future asbestos claims. The trial court ruled that those bankruptcy proceedings not only conclusively determined Fuller-Austin’s liability but also provided a mechanism for determining the aggregate value of that liability for the purposes of indemnification. Thereafter, a jury calculated and found appellants liable for a fixed sum that constituted the amount of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.