OLAES

Olaes v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Good Law
135 Cal. App. 4th 1501·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 85·2006 Daily Journal DAR 1163·38 Cal. Rptr. 3d 467·24 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 61
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 2006C048194California3,170 words

Opinion

Opinion

Raye, J.

Defendants Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Nationwide Health Plans (Nationwide) terminated plaintiff employee Danny S. Olaes following allegations of sexual harassment. Olaes filed a complaint for damages against his former employer, alleging he had been defamed during Nationwide’s investigation of the harassment complaints. Nationwide sought to dismiss the complaint via a motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. The trial court denied the motion to strike. Nationwide appeals, arguing Olaes’s complaint falls within the ambit of section 425.16 and Olaes failed to establish a probability of success on the merits. We shall affirm the trial court’s denial of Nationwide’s motion to strike.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 2001 a Nationwide employee complained about Olaes’s unwelcome comments and touching. An investigation that followed revealed other complaints. In May 2003 another woman complained about unwanted touching by Olaes. Nationwide discharged Olaes.

Olaes filed a complaint alleging Nationwide falsely accused him of sexual harassment and failed to adequately investigate prior to his termination. Nationwide filed a motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.