California Highway Patrol v. Superior Court

Good Law
135 Cal. App. 4th 488·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 3·2006 Daily Journal DAR 151·38 Cal. Rptr. 3d 16·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 130
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 2006A109209California8,319 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pollak, J.

California law permits public agencies such as petitioner California Highway Patrol (CHP) to seek reimbursement of emergency response costs from any person causing an incident requiring an emergency response as a consequence of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs (sometimes referred to as DUI). (Gov. Code, § 53150.) In this writ proceeding we consider which costs a public agency may recover under the governing statute.

The trial court granted summary adjudication to real party in interest Esteban Allende, concluding that the CHP may not recover expenses incurred to enforce the laws that prohibit driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including the cost of performing a field sobriety test and making an arrest. The trial court limited recovery to response costs for activities which it deemed unrelated to enforcement of the DUI laws, such as directing traffic and ensuring public safety at the accident site, investigating the accident, preparing accident reports, and transporting disabled vehicles. The CHP argues that the trial court applied too restrictive a standard, which would compel it to perform an artificial and unworkable allocation of officer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.