Crites

People v. Crites

Good Law
135 Cal. App. 4th 1251·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 71·2006 Daily Journal DAR 1007·37 Cal. Rptr. 3d 915·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 792
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 2006B178046California1,158 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perren, J.

Clinton Duane Grites appeals the judgment after his conviction for first degree murder (Pen. Code, §§ 187, subd. (a), 189). Among other enhancement findings, the jury made true findings on separate allegations that Grites had personally used two deadly or dangerous weapons in the commission of the murder. (§ 12022, subd. (b)(1).) Grites contends there was insufficient evidence of premeditation and deliberation to support a first degree murder conviction. He also claims that the trial court erred in denying his Marsden motion and in staying, rather than striking, one of the two section 12022, subdivision (b)(1) enhancements. We hold that the trial court properly imposed a one-year section 12022, subdivision (b) enhancement for use of one deadly, weapon and imposed, but stayed, an additional enhancement under the same statute for use of a second weapon. We affirm.

FACTS

In July and August 2003, appellant’s wife Christy Grites was living in the apartment of victim Douglas Okashima. Grites and his wife had separated but he continued to visit her and their children at Okashima’s apartment. Mrs. Grites moved out of the apartment in late August or early September 2003.

Grites…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.