Campbell

People v. Campbell

Good Law
104 Cal. App. Supp. 4th 1·129 Cal. Rptr. 2d 601
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 10, 2002BR 041865California1,793 words

Opinion

Opinion

P. McKAY, J.

The order of the trial court reducing the offense against respondent to an infraction is reversed. The matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

The procedural history of this case can be briefly summarized as follows: On November 9, 2001, the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office (hereinafter appellant) filed a one-count complaint against defendant Wayne Campbell (hereinafter respondent) alleging a misdemeanor violation of Penal Code section 484, subdivision (a), [1] petty theft. On January 2, 2002, at a pretrial hearing, respondent entered a plea of no contest to the charge. On its own motion and over appellant's objection, but with respondent's consent, the trial court pursuant to section 17, subdivision (d), reduced the charge to an infraction, and imposed a fine of $100 plus penalty assessments. Timely notice of appeal followed.

The singular issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court, with the consent of the accused and over the objection of the prosecutor, is authorized by statute to reduce a misdemeanor charge of petty theft to an infraction. We answer this question in the negative and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.