Valdez

People v. Valdez

Good Law
126 Cal. App. 4th 575·23 Cal. Rptr. 3d 909
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 2005C036614, C037039California2,731 words

Opinion

Opinion

Scotland, J.

Defendants Elisio Valdez and Johnnie Ray Peraza were convicted of various crimes, including the murders of Andrea Mesías and her fetus, the premeditated attempted murder of Ronny Giminez, and the false imprisonment and aggravated assault of Nancy Davis. The crimes were committed at separate times and in separate places. The prosecutor theorized that defendants went to Mestas’s apartment intending to kill her boyfriend on orders from the Nuestra Familia, a prison gang. The prosecutor also presented evidence that the Nuestra Familia considered Mesías to be a “rat” and a “snitch.” As to the motive for the Giminez shootings and the crimes against Davis, who was defendant Peraza’s girlfriend, evidence indicated that Peraza was upset because Davis had been seeing Giminez, the father of three of her children.

Defendant Valdez was sentenced to multiple life sentences, plus a determinate term of 11 years and 8 months in prison. Defendant Peraza received multiple life sentences, plus a determinate term of 14 years in prison. On appeal, they raise numerous claims of error.

In the published part of this opinion, we reject defendants’ claim that (1) California’s murder statute does…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.