Overman

People v. Overman

Good Law
126 Cal. App. 4th 1344·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 250·2005 Daily Journal DAR 1981·24 Cal. Rptr. 3d 798·5 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1493
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 2005E033784California6,139 words

Opinion

Opinion

King, J.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant was charged with the attempted murders of Larry Dahl (Larry) and Matthew Bowers (Bowers) in counts 1 and 2, assaulting the same men with a firearm in counts 3 and 4, and discharging a firearm at an occupied building in count 5. (Pen. Code, §§ 664, 187, 245, subd. (a)(2) & 246.) It was further alleged that defendant personally discharged a firearm in counts 1 and 2 (§ 12022.53, subd. (c)), and personally used a firearm in counts 3, 4, and 5 (§§ 12022.5, subd. (a)(1) [counts 3 and 4], 667 & 1192.7, subd. (c)(8) [count 5].) A jury found defendant not guilty of the attempted murder charges (counts 1 and 2), but convicted him of assaulting Larry and Bowers with a firearm and of discharging a firearm at an occupied building (counts 3, 4, and 5). The jury also found the personal use allegations true. Defendant was sentenced to 12 years in prison.

Defendant appeals. He contends that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury on the “intent” element of discharging a firearm at an occupied building (§ 246) in count 5, and erroneously refused to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense, as charged, of the grossly negligent discharge of a firearm…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.