City of San Diego v. D.R. Horton San Diego Holding Co.

Bad Law
126 Cal. App. 4th 668·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 193·2005 Daily Journal DAR 1556·24 Cal. Rptr. 3d 338
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 2005D043425California6,082 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Rourke, J.

In this eminent domain action, the City of San Diego (City) sought to acquire approximately 12.69 acres of property from a larger parcel owned by D.R. Horton San Diego Holding Company, Inc. (Horton) for a particular segment of the State Route 56 freeway project. In a special verdict, the jury determined that the fair market value of the property taken was $5,589,200, that severance damages to the remainder parcel before consideration of the project’s benefits was $5,324,000, and that the project benefits were $5,443,800. Based on these figures, the jury determined there were no net severance damages and the total compensation to be awarded Horton was $5,589,200. On Horton’s motion for new trial, the trial court concluded the jury’s determination of the value of the property taken in its special verdict was based on a valuation of $445,000 per net developable acre, and its award of severance damages was based on a figure derived from a value of $850,000 per net developable acre. The court granted the motion on the ground the jury’s findings as to these components were internally inconsistent and thus against the law.

City contends the court erred in granting a new trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.