Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Superior Court

Good Law
126 Cal. App. 4th 1131·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 232·2005 Daily Journal DAR 1869·24 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1368
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 2005B176030California6,066 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rubin, J.

The Roman Catholic Diocese of Orange (the Church) has been sued by numerous persons claiming they were the victims of childhood sexual abuse by various priests. Petitioners are the Church’s liability insurers. They seek to vacate a written order by a settlement judge purporting to: (1) determine the good faith settlement value of the cases; (2) preclude the insurers from declaring a forfeiture of coverage should the Church settle without their consent; and (3) provide evidence of the insurers’ bad faith for future use. As set forth below, we grant the petition because the settlement judge exceeded his authority by making factual findings and otherwise preparing a coercive order in violation of the fundamental principles governing mediation proceedings.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The Church is the principal defendant in an action brought by approximately 90 persons (plaintiffs) for alleged childhood sexual abuse by certain priests. Those cases known collectively as Clergy Cases I were coordinated within the Los Angeles County Superior Court with claims against dioceses in other parts of the state. In July 2003, Judge Peter D. Lichtman was appointed by stipulated order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.