Collins

Collins v. State

Good Law
121 Cal. App. 4th 1112·18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 112·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1409·2004 Daily Journal DAR 10585·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7863
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 25, 2004C042832California6,853 words

Opinion

Opinion

Robie, J.

In this personal injury case, plaintiff William F. Collins was represented by the Law Offices of Joseph W. Carcione, Jr. One of the lawyers from Carcione’s firm, Steve Purtill, hired Carl C. Clark, Ph.D., as an expert witness on the subject matter of windshields. Unbeknownst to Purtill, a year earlier, counsel for two defendants hired Dr. Clark as a consultant for his clients on the same subject matter. After Purtill disclosed Dr. Clark as a retained expert witness, the trial court granted the defendants’ motion to disqualify Collins’s counsel. Collins and his wife, Barbara, appeal this order and the subsequent order denying their motion for reconsideration.

Disqualification of opposing counsel is authorized by the court’s power to control the ministerial officers before it and may be justified to protect an opposing party from the unfair use of confidential information against that party. Here, however, disqualification of the Carcione law firm was unwarranted. That firm had no notice of Dr. Clark’s dual status until defense counsel raised the issue because Dr. Clark never disclosed his dual retention. Further, the Carcione firm ceased all direct contact with Dr. Clark…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.