People v. Johnson

Good Law
121 Cal. App. 4th 1409·18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 230·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1458·2004 Daily Journal DAR 10854·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8091
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 31, 2004A105199California1,349 words

Opinion

Opinion

Parrilli, J.

Keith Leviol Johnson appeals from a judgment sending him to prison for three years for a probation violation. He contends the admission of a hearsay laboratory report at the revocation hearing violated his constitutional rights under Crawford v. Washington (2004) 541 U.S. 36 [ 158 L.Ed.2d 177 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 ] (Crawford). We disagree, and affirm the judgment.

Johnson was put on probation after pleading no contest to a charge of petty theft with a prior. Probation revocation proceedings were initiated after a police officer observed Johnson selling a rock of cocaine on a Berkeley street. At the hearing, the court admitted a report from the Alameda County Crime Laboratory analyzing the rock that was the subject of the transaction. Defense counsel unsuccessfully objected on “hearsay and foundation grounds.”

After the hearing, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Crawford , holding that admission of “testimonial” out-of-court statements is barred by the confrontation clause of the Sixth Amendment unless the witness is unavailable and the defendant had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the witness. (Crawford, supra, 541 U.S. at p. 68 [ 158 L.Ed.2d at p.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.