Klajic

Klajic v. Castaic Lake Water Agency

Bad Law
121 Cal. App. 4th 5·16 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1243·2004 Daily Journal DAR 9291·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6840
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 2004B161069, B163110California4,056 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aldrich, J.

INTRODUCTION

We are asked by the Castaic Lake Water Agency (the Agency) to construe section 15.1 of its enabling act, effective January 2002. (Stats. 2001, ch. 929, § 3, 72A West’s Ann. Wat.—Appen. (2004 Supp.) § 103—1 et seq., p. 487 et seq., hereinafter the Agency Enabling Act.) The Agency has appealed from the judgment of the trial court ordering the issuance of a writ of mandate that prohibits the Agency from selling drinking water directly to consumers. The court ruled that section 15.1 of the Agency Enabling Act is not an independent grant of authority, and to sell water directly to the consumer, the Agency must first comply with the requirements of Water Code section 12944.7, subdivision (b).

On appeal, the Agency contends section 15.1 of the Agency Enabling Act authorizes it, a water wholesaler, to sell water at retail independent of section 12944.7, subdivision (b). We hold the Agency correctly construes the introductory phrase in section 15.1 of the Agency Enabling Act. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and the award of attorney fees.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

1. The factual predicate.

Created by the Legislature, the Agency is a special district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.