Wilbanks

Wilbanks v. Wolk

Caution
121 Cal. App. 4th 883·17 Cal. Rptr. 3d 497·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1356·2004 Daily Journal DAR 10172·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7575
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 17, 2004A101100California8,813 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stein, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting a special motion to strike a complaint as a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP), pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, and awarding defendant her attorney fees. We find that the suit was subject to the special motion to dismiss, requiring plaintiffs to establish a reasonable probability of prevailing on the merits. We further find that plaintiffs made the requisite showing. We therefore reverse.

BACKGROUND

The case concerns statements allegedly made against a viatical settlements brokerage, and the owner of the brokerage. According to a 2001 article in Forbes Magazine, viaticáis are arrangements that allow dying persons with life insurance policies to sell their policies to investors for a percentage of the death benefits. As a practical matter, the sooner the viator dies, the greater the return on the investment. In the meantime, the viator obtains funds to pay for medical care or other expenses. Viatical settlement firms provide the capital used to purchase the policies, typically receiving a fee of 20 to 30 percent of the amount of the death benefits. The policies are sold through independent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.