Haney

Haney v. Aramark Uniform Services, Inc.

Bad Law
121 Cal. App. 4th 623·17 Cal. Rptr. 3d 336·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1308·2004 Daily Journal DAR 9886·175 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2585
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 11, 2004F042980California7,207 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dawson, J.

In this appeal, a former employee alleges he was discharged because he complained about fraudulent billing practices and refused to implement those practices and, thus, his discharge violated public policy. The employer obtained summary adjudication of the wrongful discharge claim on the ground that it was preempted by federal labor statutes because (1) the employee engaged in arguably protected concerted activity and (2) the claim could not be decided independent of the just cause termination provisions contained in the applicable collective bargaining agreement.

We hold that the trial court erred in granting summary adjudication because (1) the employer’s separate statement of undisputed facts did not set forth facts and reference evidence that demonstrated that the employee’s individual acts were linked with actual group action and, accordingly, that the employee engaged in arguably concerted activity for purposes of the federal statute, and (2) resolution of the wrongful discharge claim is not dependent upon an interpretation of the collective bargaining agreement. In addition, we hold that the public policy of discouraging fraud constitutes a fundamental public…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.