Derwinski

American Federation of Government Employees, L-2110 v. Derwinski

Good Law
777 F. Supp. 1493·91 Daily Journal DAR 14740·1991 WL 253046·6 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1301·1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17422
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 1991C-88-20357-WAI, C-88-20361-WAICalifornia4,990 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ingram, J.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

These consolidated actions challenge and seek to enjoin the implementation of the testing components of the Veterans Administration Drug Free Workplace Plan adopted by the Veterans Administration, 53 Fed.Reg. 11970 (the “Plan”) in response to the provisions of Executive Order 12564.51 Fed.Reg. 32889.

This court has previously granted preliminary injunctions restraining implementation of the Plan’s testing provisions with respect to random, post-accident and reasonable suspicion testing. Now before the court are cross motions for summary judgment and defendants’ motion to vacate preliminary injunctions.

Each of the motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as hereinafter provided.

There are six different categories of persons or situations which, under the Plan, can trigger urinalysis drug testing to discern the presence in the body of marijuana, cocaine, the opiates, the amphetamines and phencyclidine (“PCP”). These are random testing, reasonable-suspicion testing, post-accident testing, follow-up testing, applicant testing and voluntary testing.

Plaintiffs in Action No. 88-20361 challenge random, post-accident, reasonable-suspicion and follow-up…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.