Akhile

People v. Akhile

Good Law
167 Cal. App. 4th 558·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 1583·84 Cal. Rptr. 3d 236
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 9, 2008A119729California2,425 words

Opinion

Opinion

Simons, J.

To ensure that noncitizens are aware of potential immigration consequences before they enter a plea of guilty or no contest to a criminal charge, Penal Code section 1016.5, subdivision (a), sets out a specific advisement for the trial court to provide “[pjrior to acceptance” of the plea. When the trial court fails to provide this advisement, the defendant is entitled to have the plea vacated, after making a showing that he or she faces an adverse immigration consequence due to the conviction and was prejudiced by the nonadvisement. The trial court denied appellant Fred Omoighe Akhile’s section 1016.5 motion to vacate because the prosecution proved he had been advised of the immigration consequences at his arraignment several weeks before entering his plea. We reverse because we construe section 1016.5 to require that the advice be provided during the taking of the plea. We remand to permit the trial court to determine whether appellant has demonstrated he was prejudiced by receiving the advice prematurely and whether his motion was timely filed.

BACKGROUND

Appellant is a native of Nigeria, who entered the United States on a tourist visa in 1982 and never left. In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.