Stillwell

Stillwell v. the Salvation Army

Good Law
167 Cal. App. 4th 360·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 1560·84 Cal. Rptr. 3d 111·28 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 616
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 6, 2008D050794California8,936 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aaron, J.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Arthur Stillwell filed this action after The Salvation Army (TSA), his former employer, terminated his employment. In his complaint, Stillwell claimed that TSA breached an implied employment agreement to terminate him only for good cause. At trial, TSA claimed that Stillwell had entered into a written employment agreement (the 1998 Agreement) that provided that Stillwell’s employment status was at will. Stillwell, in turn, contended that the 1998 Agreement was invalid because TSA’s field secretary for personnel had not signed it, as the terms of the agreement require.

The jury returned a special verdict in which it found that the 1998 Agreement was effective, but also found that TSA had breached an implied agreement to terminate Stillwell only for cause. The jury awarded Stillwell $155,363.38 in damages. After the jury returned its verdicts, TSA moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and for a new trial. TSA’s primary contention in both motions was that the at-will provision in the 1998 Agreement precluded Stillwell from prevailing on any claim that TSA breached an implied agreement to terminate him only for cause. The trial court granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.