Brinkley

Brinkley v. Public Storage, Inc.

Bad Law
167 Cal. App. 4th 1278
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 5, 2008B200513California4,130 words

Opinion

Opinion

Plaintiff asserts class action and individual claims for violations of the Labor Code. He alleges that defendant, his former employer, provided paystubs containing misstatements in violation of Labor Code section 226. [1] An employer, however, cannot be liable for misstatements on pay stubs unless it knowingly and intentionally makes such misstatements and an employee suffers injury as a result. Plaintiff cannot prove either element in this case.

Plaintiff also asserts causes of action based on section 226.7 on the ground that defendant failed to ensure that plaintiff and other class members took all meal periods and rest periods they were entitled to take. California law, however, only requires that employers make available such periods, which defendant did here.

We affirm the trial court's order granting defendant summary adjudication with respect to plaintiff's section 226 and section 226.7 causes of action.

Plaintiff and appellant Fred Brinkley worked as a property manager for defendant and respondent Public Storage, Inc., for a little more than four months before defendant terminated his employment. Plaintiff was a non-exempt employee.

Plaintiff and other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.