Williamson

Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.

Good Law
167 Cal. App. 4th 905·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 1674·84 Cal. Rptr. 3d 545
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 22, 2008G038845California6,213 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rylaarsdam, J.

This appeal concerns Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 208 ( 49 C.F.R. § 571.208 (2008); FMVSS 208), a regulation promulgated under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 ( 49 U.S.C. § 30101 et seq.; Safety Act), which authorizes automobile manufacturers to install a lap-only seatbelt at the inboard seating positions of a vehicle. The issue is whether the regulation preempts a common law tort action against a manufacturer for not choosing the option to install a lap/shoulder seatbelt at such a position. We conclude that under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Geier v. American Honda Motor Co. (2000) 529 U.S. 861 [ 146 L.Ed.2d 914 , 120 S.Ct. 1913 ] and its progeny this claim is preempted because it conflicts with FMVSS 208.

In addition, while plaintiffs alleged other grounds for recovery not barred by federal preemption, in light of their concessions the failure to use a lap/shoulder seatbelt was “integral” to the case, we affirm the judgment dismissing the action.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Delbert Williamson, Alexa Williamson, through Delbert as her guardian ad litem, and the Estate of Thanh Williamson sued…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.