Citizens for Civic Accountability v. Town of Danville

Good Law
167 Cal. App. 4th 1158·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 1697·84 Cal. Rptr. 3d 684·70 A.L.R. 6th 787
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 27, 2008A121899California2,115 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dondero, J.

Consistent with a court order mandating electronic filing and service in this complex litigation matter, the clerk of the court e-mailed the parties a notice that judgment had been filed. The e-mail directed the parties to a Web site where they could sign in and open an electronic copy of the file-stamped judgment. Respondents move to dismiss this appeal because appellant did not file a notice of appeal within 60 days of its receipt of the clerk’s e-mail. We deny the motion and hold that the 60-day appeal period in California Rules of Court, rule 8.104(a)(1) is triggered only by the mailing of a judgment by the United States Postal Service.

Background

Citizens for Civic Accountability (Citizens) petitioned the Contra Costa Superior Court for a writ of mandate and an injunction that would overturn the Town of Danville’s approval of a residential development project. (Citizens for Public Accountability v. Town of Danville (Super. Ct. Contra Costa County, 2008, No. MSN07-1359).) The court designated the matter complex litigation and in October 2007 issued an order mandating electronic filing and service in accordance with the court’s Electronic Case Filing Standing Order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.