SN Sands Corp. v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
167 Cal. App. 4th 185·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 1478·83 Cal. Rptr. 3d 885
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2008A120576California4,223 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pollak, J.

SN Sands Corporation doing business as S&S Trucking (S&S) challenges the jurisdiction of the Board of Supervisors (the board) of the City and County of San Francisco (the city) to disapprove the entry of a contract by the city’s public utilities commission (PUC) that was conditionally awarded to S&S through a competitive bidding process. The board’s jurisdiction is governed by a provision of the city charter requiring the board to approve contracts with “anticipated expenditures” of $10 million or more. The parties disagree about the proper interpretation of this provision where, as here, the contract is not for a fixed dollar amount, and they dispute whether the anticipated expenses under the proposed contract with S&S meet the $10 million threshold. We agree with S&S and the trial court that the anticipated cost of a proposed contract must be based on probable expenditures for which there is evidentiary support, and that the board assumed jurisdiction in this case without any such support and contrary to the only evidence that was before it. Moreover, as the trial court also concluded, the additional evidence presented by the city also fails to show that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.