Secrest

Secrest v. SECURITY NATIONAL MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2002-2

Good Law
167 Cal. App. 4th 544·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 1581·84 Cal. Rptr. 3d 275
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 9, 2008G039065California4,521 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fybel, J.

I.

Introduction

We hold an agreement by which a lender agreed to forbear from exercising the right of foreclosure under a deed of trust securing an interest in real property comes within the statute of frauds. We also conclude the borrowers in this case failed as a matter of law to establish estoppel to assert the statute of frauds. As a result, we affirm a judgment declaring valid a notice of default and election to sell under a deed of trust.

Appellants Luther E. Secrest and Charmella C. Secrest (the Secrests) are the borrowers on a note secured by a deed of trust on their home. Respondents Security National Mortgage Loan Trust 2002-2, JP Morgan Chase Bank, and SN Servicing Corporation (collectively, Respondents) are the current holders of the note and deed of trust. After Respondents recorded a notice of default and election to sell under the deed of trust, the Secrests filed this lawsuit seeking a declaration the notice of default was invalid and an injunction to stop foreclosure proceedings.

In support of their motion for a preliminary injunction, the Secrests produced a purported written forbearance agreement made in January 2002 (the January 2002 Forbearance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.