Glenn

People v. Glenn

Good Law
100 Cal. Rptr. 3d 685·178 Cal. App. 4th 778
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 26, 2009G040608, G041245California18,494 words

Opinion

Opinion

James Roy Glenn was adjudged a sexually violent predator (SVP) under the Sexually Violent Predator Act, Welfare and Institutions Code section 6600 et seq. (SVPA), [1] and was placed in involuntary commitment for an indeterminate term. Glenn was 82 years old at the time of trial. He appealed, and later filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus also challenging the commitment order. We issued an order to show cause and consolidated the writ petition with the appeal. We affirm the judgment and deny the writ petition.

Glenn was committed as an SVP following initial evaluations under section 6601, subdivision (a) conducted in accordance with a standardized assessment protocol developed by the State Department of Mental Health (DMH). In 2008, the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) determined the 2007 standardized assessment protocol constituted an invalid "underground" regulation.

First, we conclude the trial court did not err by precluding one of Glenn's expert psychologists from testifying about studies and research conducted by nontestifying mental health experts concerning whether pedophilia is chronic.

Second, even assuming for sake of argument the OAL was correct…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.