Nielsen

Nielsen v. Gibson

Good Law
100 Cal. Rptr. 3d 335·178 Cal. App. 4th 318·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1661·2009 WL 3261675
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 13, 2009C059291California3,496 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

David Nielsen and his wife Trida brought this action against Guy Gibson, in his capacity as executor of the estate of Betty an Gayl Bender (Gayl), and her heirs, to quiet title to property adjacent to the Nielsen home (the property, or the subject property). Following an unreported court trial, the court found the Nielsens had established they had acquired the subject property through adverse possession and entered judgment quieting title in the Nielsens.

Gibson appeals on the judgment roll. He contends that, under Code of Civil Procedure section 328, the five-year adverse possession period did not begin to run until after Gayl’s death because she was incapacitated and incapable of managing her own affairs before the Nielsens began possessing the subject property. In an unpublished portion of the opinion, we conclude the record does not contain evidence supporting this claim.

Gibson also contends the court erred in finding that Gayl could have had reasonable notice of the Nielsens’ possession of the property, because Gayl was in Ireland during the whole of the five-year period. In the published portion of the opinion, we reject this argument.

We therefore find no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.