Nader Automotive Group, LLC v. New Motor Vehicle Board

Good Law
101 Cal. Rptr. 3d 152·178 Cal. App. 4th 1478
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 20, 2009C059144, C059180California2,331 words

Opinion

Opinion

Robie, J.

In these two consolidated cases, plaintiffs Nader Automotive Group, LLC, and its general manager, Nader Eghtesad (collectively Nader), protested Nader’s termination as franchised dealers of Volkswagen of America, Inc., and Audi of America, Inc., the real parties in interest. The New Motor Vehicle Board (board) dismissed the protests based on Nader’s failure to comply with authorized discovery without substantial justification.

The dismissal was premised on Vehicle Code section 3050.2, subdivision (b) (section 3050.2(b)), which reads in relevant part as follows: “The executive director [of the board] may, at the direction of the board, upon a showing of failure to comply with authorized discovery without substantial justification for that failure, dismiss the protest or petition or suspend the proceedings pending compliance.”

Nader petitioned the trial court for writs of mandate directing the board to set aside the dismissals. The court denied the petitions, and Nader timely appeals.

On appeal, Nader has two main contentions (some of which it separates out into other argument headings): (1) section 3050.2(b) is unconstitutional on its face and as applied; and (2) the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.