Kawagoe

Carson Citizens for Reform v. Kawagoe

Bad Law
100 Cal. Rptr. 3d 358·178 Cal. App. 4th 357·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1665
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 13, 2009B209424California4,913 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kriegler, J.

Proponents of a petition to recall a local mayor disputed the validity of requests by voters to withdraw their signatures from the petition that were filed with the city clerk and honored by the county registrar, because the requests lacked a declaration of a circulator, and in some instances, the voter signed the petition after filing the request. The city clerk filed an action for declaratory relief against the county registrar, naming the recall proponents and the mayor as real parties in interest. The recall proponents filed a cross-complaint for declaratory relief and a writ of mandate. The trial court declared that a request to withdraw a signature under Elections Code sections 103 or 11303 must be accompanied by a declaration of circulator as provided in section 104, and is ineffective as to a subsequent signature. The trial court issued a writ of mandate to the city clerk to certify the petition as sufficient. In a subsequent order, the trial court awarded attorney fees to the recall proponents under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 as against the county registrar and the city clerk. The county registrar appeals from the judgment and the order awarding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.