USDA

Citizens for Better Forestry v. U.S. Department of Agriculture

Bad Law
632 F. Supp. 2d 968·2009 WL 1883728·39 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20145·70 ERC (BNA) 1296·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55510
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 2009C 08-1927 CWCalifornia5,497 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilken, J.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs Citizens for Better Forestry, et al. (collectively, Citizens) charge De fendants United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), et al. with failing to adhere to procedures required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA) when they promulgated regulations that govern the development of management plans for forests within the National Forest System. The parties now cross-move for summary judgment. The matter was heard on April 2, 2009. Having considered oral argument and all of the papers submitted by the parties, the Court grants Citizens’ motion and denies the USDA’s cross-motion.

BACKGROUND

The National Forest System includes approximately 193 million acres of land and is administered by the U.S. Forest Service, an agency within the USDA. In 1976, Congress enacted the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) to reform management of the National Forests. The Act established a three-tiered regulatory approach to forest management, with different tiers existing at the national, regional and local levels.

At the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.