Rehman

Rehman v. Department of Motor Vehicles

Good Law
100 Cal. Rptr. 3d 510·178 Cal. App. 4th 581·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1689·2009 D.A.R. 14
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 20, 2009C060579California2,347 words

Opinion

Opinion

Robie, J.

Plaintiff Atiqur Rehman filed a petition for a writ of mandate seeking an order directing defendant Department of Motor Vehicles (the department) to rescind its suspension of his driver’s license because, with a blood-alcohol content of 0.04 percent or more, he drove a vehicle that requires a commercial driver’s license. (Veh. Code, § 13353.2, subd. (a)(3).) The trial court denied the petition.

On appeal, Rehman contends that while the department can immediately suspend the driver’s license of a person who, with a blood-alcohol content of 0.04 percent or more, drives a vehicle that requires a commercial driver’s license, the department cannot sustain an order of suspension following an administrative hearing unless the person had a blood-alcohol content of 0.08 percent or more. (§ 13557, subd. (b)(2)(C)(i).)

We agree with the trial court that this is one of the rare instances in which we must disregard the literal terms of a statute because they conflict with another statute and would compel an absurd result that the Legislature obviously did not intend. Accordingly, we conclude that a blood-alcohol content of 0.04 percent or more was sufficient both to suspend Rehman’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.