Gardner

Gardner v. Schwarzenegger

Good Law
101 Cal. Rptr. 3d 229·178 Cal. App. 4th 1366·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1789·2009 D.A.R. 15
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 5, 2009A122920California5,347 words

Opinion

Opinion

Marchiano, J.

Defendants Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, Attorney General Edmund G. Brown, Jr., and Secretary of State Debra Bowen appeal from a judgment enjoining enforcement of Senate Bill No. 1137 (2005-2006 Reg. Sess.) sections 1 through 12 (Stats. 2006, ch. 63, §§ 1-12; hereafter Senate Bill 1137), that sought to amend the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000 (hereafter Proposition 36). The issues are whether the provisions of Senate Bill 1137 challenged by plaintiffs Cliff Gardner, Drug Policy Alliance, and California Society of Addiction Medicine further the purposes of Proposition 36, and, if not, whether Senate Bill 1137 can be submitted to the voters for approval. We hold that certain of the challenged sections of Senate Bill 1137 cannot reasonably be construed to further the purposes of Proposition 36, and that Senate Bill 1137’s provision for a popular vote, if any part of Senate Bill 1137 is invalidated, is itself invalid. Consistent with these conclusions, we affirm the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Proposition

Proposition 36, passed by the voters in the November 2000 general election, generally provides that those convicted of drug possession offenses are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.