Evans

Evans v. Lasco Bathware, Inc.

Good Law
101 Cal. Rptr. 3d 354·178 Cal. App. 4th 1417·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1790
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 13, 2009D053731California7,594 words

Opinion

Opinion

McDONALD, J.

Plaintiffs Roy L. Evans and Arthea LaFrades (together plaintiffs) each owned homes in which shower pans manufactured by defendant Lasco Bathware, Inc. (Lasco), were installed. Plaintiffs’ action against Lasco alleged the shower pans suffered from design defects that resulted in water leakage, and the leakage caused damage to adjacent building components. Plaintiffs’ fourth amended complaint (FAC), styled as a proposed class action lawsuit, alleged two causes of action against Lasco: a claim for strict products liability, and a claim for negligence.

The present appeal challenges the trial court order denying class certification. Plaintiffs assert the trial court abused its discretion when it denied their motion for class certification.

I

LAW APPLICABLE TO CLASS CERTIFICATION ORDERS

A. Standards for Class Actions

Code of Civil Procedure section 382 authorizes class actions in California when “the question is one of a common or general interest, of many persons, or when the parties are numerous, and it is impracticable to bring them all before the court . . . .” The burden is on the party seeking certification to establish the existence of both an ascertainable class…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.