Zhang

Zhang v. Superior Court

Good Law
100 Cal. Rptr. 3d 803·178 Cal. App. 4th 1081
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 29, 2009E047207California3,267 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grant, Genovese & Baratta, Lance D. Orloff and Aaron J. Mortensen for Real Party in Interest.

RICHLI, Acting P. J.—

This case presents the question of whether fraudulent conduct by an insurer, which is connected with conduct that would violate Insurance Code section 790.03 et seq.—sometimes referred to as the Unfair Insurance Practices Act—can also give rise to a private civil cause of action under the unfair competition law (UCL), Business and Professions Code section 17200 et seq. The trial court ruled that it does not and, therefore, sustained defendant and real party in interest California Capital Insurance Company's demurrer to a cause of action under the UCL. We disagree and will direct the trial court to reinstate the cause of action.

The facts—procedural facts—and content of the allegations are not in dispute and may be quickly summarized. Plaintiff Yanting Zhang has sued her insurer, California Capital Insurance Company, over a dispute following a fire at Zhang's commercial premises. In the complaint's "Factual Background" and first two causes of action—based on the legal theories of breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith—Zhang sets out a litany of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.