Vargas

People v. Vargas

Good Law
100 Cal. Rptr. 3d 578·178 Cal. App. 4th 647·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1697
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 22, 2009B211821California6,258 words

Opinion

Opinion

Willhite, J.

A jury convicted defendant Amulfo Vargas of various sex offenses against four victims—Shosh G., Maria R., Tamika G., and Bin Z.—and also found true three so-called “one strike” allegations. The trial court sentenced defendant to three consecutive terms of 25 years to life in state prison, one consecutive term of 15 years to life, and a total consecutive determinate term of 61 years.

On appeal, defendant raises two contentions under Crawford v. Washington (2004) 541 U.S. 36 [ 158 L.Ed.2d 177 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 ] (Crawford), and its progeny. First, he contends that the trial court erred in admitting “testimonial” hearsay statements made by Maria R. during a sexual assault examination, requiring reversal of count 3 (forcible rape) and count 6 (sexual penetration by a foreign object). In the published portion of our opinion, we conclude that the court erred in admitting Maria R.’s hearsay statements. The error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt as to defendant’s conviction of count 3 (forcible rape), but not as to his conviction of count 6 (sexual penetration by a foreign object). We therefore reverse the latter conviction and the sentence on that count.

In the unpublished…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.